
NITRATES IN DRINKING WATER
In a comprehensive study of neural tube defects, we calculated
pregnancy exposure to nitratescommonly occurring substances
found in foods, medications, drinking water and cigarette
smoke. Public water companies provided information on nitrate
levels and water sources (groundwater, surface water or both)
for each woman's residence.
 |
Only groundwater contained nitrate exceeding
the current allowable standard of 45 milligrams/liter.
Exposure above this maximum contaminant level (MCL) was
associated with a 4 times higher risk for anencephaly
(absence of the brain). There was no increased risk for
spina bifida (open spine defects), another type of neural
tube defect. |
 |
 |
Women whose drinking water contained nitrate
levels below the MCL had a higher risk for anencephaly,
but only when the source was groundwater. No increased
risk was seen at comparable nitrate levels when drinking
water was a mixture of surface and groundwater. |
 |
 |
Similar levels in groundwater and mixed
water did not have the same effect. This inconsistency
raises the possibility that some other factor, or combination
of factors, is responsible for the increased risk noted
in groundwater drinkers. |
 |
 |
Other contaminants in the groundwatersuch
as pesticidesdid not provide an alternate explanation
for the increased risk. |
 |
 |
It is possible that nitrate exposure in
water was misclassified, since it was estimated at the
water supplier rather than at the tap. Mixed water sources
may alternate between surface and groundwater, defying
accurate classification. |
SANTA CLARA COUNTY WATER STUDIES
Several early California Birth Defects Monitoring Program
studies looked at heart defects and drinking water in births
from 1981-1983; this was prompted by the detection in 1981
of solvent contamination in the groundwater drinking supply
for a small area of Santa Clara County.
A possible relationship between drinking tap water and heart
defects was noted countywide (beyond the area of known contamination),
primarily in 1981. Drinking bottled water was a protective
factor. However, there were many potential sources of bias
in the studyinterviews were conducted 3-7 years after
birth; intense publicity about water contamination may have
influenced mothers' responses.
A follow-up study used county water company records to determine
if mothers' homes received chlorinated water during early
pregnancy and to estimate exposure to chlorine (added to water
as a disinfectant) and trihalomethanes (a disinfectant by-product).
Neither substance was associated with higher risks, whether
exposure came through drinking or bathing/ showering.

|