
In 1982, Dr. John Harris and Dr. Richard Jackson in conjunction with California's legislature and governor established
a groundbreaking program for birth defects monitoring
and research. The California Birth Defects Monitoring
Program has since become a model for surveillance
in
other states and a worldwide leader in birth defects
research.
Our findings have guided an evolving focus over the
years. Today's Program is an efficient, highly-targeted
operation performing sophisticated pioneering research
in birth defects causes. But such success did not come
overnightit has taken 20 years to mount this effort.
1ST ERA: ESTABLISHING THE BASELINE
Granted legislative authority to confidentially access
medical records in hospitals, genetics clinics and labs,
the Program began monitoring in the 5 counties around
the San Francisco Bay. Early accomplishments include:
 |
Data collection protocols.
We set procedures for identifying children with
birth defects, reviewing medical records and linking
cases with Vital Statisticsnow widely used
as a prototype for other US programs. |
 |
 |
Registry expansion. New counties
were added to the surveillance area, with statewide
coverage achieved in 1990. |
 |
 |
Baseline data. The Program
published the overall frequency of birth defects-establishing
for the first time California's "normal"
rates. |
 |
 |
Descriptive epidemiology. Mining
the data generated, scientists documented occurrence
rates, patterns and trends for specific conditions. |
 |
 |
Scientific methods. Program
scientists helped invent how the science is donefrom
interview techniques to biologic tests for verifying
exposures. |
2ND ERA: GENERATING CLUES
With a data collection and analysis framework in place,
the Program began to address the ultimate question posed
by legislators and society: what causes birth defects?
Staff established communication channels with medical/public
health practitioners and the public, incorporating their
concerns into research hypotheses.
 |
Outreach. Regional coordinators
lectured at hospitals statewide, polling alert clinicians
for their thoughts on causes. |
 |
 |
Community response. Over 100
cluster investigations and other small area studies
were done to assess public concerns about birth
defects and the environment. |
 |
 |
Collaboration. Liaisons with
scientists and other institutions around the world
provided new leads and resources to investigate
complex research issues. |
 |
 |
Research results. Studies on
neural tube defects, gastroschisis, cerebral palsy
and other conditions provide provocative findings
that call for follow-up. |
3RD ERA: SHARPENING FOCUS
After casting a broad net for data and clues, we've
learned from 20 years of experience which strategies
work and which are less effective.
 |
Data collection procedures.
The Program's huge registry databasewith information
amassed on over 3.5 million birthsmakes it
unnecessary to monitor all births and all conditions
statewide. Instead, we gather data on a core group
of conditions in a representative sample of births.
Collection and analysis procedures have been enhanced
to improve data quality. |
 |
 |
Research priorities. We now
focus on common birth defects with substantial public
health impact. Large numbers guarantee findings
will be scientifically meaningful-with potential
to prevent the most widespread conditions threatening
today's infants. Current investigations concentrate
on major heart defects, oral clefts, central nervous
system defects (neural tube defects, holoprosencephaly),
hypospadias, Down syndrome and other forms of mental retardation. |
 |
 |
Community response. Experience
has taught us that cluster investigations will probably
only uncover very potent causes of birth defectsthose
increasing rates by 10 times or more. We have the
capability to mobilize surveillance if such a "sledgehammer"
is suspected. |
 |
 |
Upgraded scientific methods. Our
studies incorporate the latest technologies, including biologic
sampling and DNA analysis, to take advantage
of new genetic discoveries by the Human Genome
Project. |
CONTINUED LEADERSHIP
With over 250 published findings, ongoing monitoring
of 219,081 births/year and trailblazing research,
the
Program continues to be a leader in birth defects research and surveillance.
|